Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 195 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2687W v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2687W v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
624
22.857142857142858%
Multi-Core
4022
23.357918578314653%
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
