Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3138 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 21% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 189 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
583
21.656760772659734%
Multi-Core
4085
25.180299574677928%
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 16 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
