Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3326 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 15% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 138 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-14900K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1055
34.02128345694937%
Multi-Core
7030
33.476190476190474%
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 24 |
| 24 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
