Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3781 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 188 vs 172 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
422
16.934189406099517%
Multi-Core
3793
45.26252983293556%
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
