Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3138 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 115 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 67% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 255 vs 153 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
422
15.676077265973253%
Multi-Core
3793
23.38038587191025%
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 16 |
| 24 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
