Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840U outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840U is 3376 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8840U - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
- Performs up to 20% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 269 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 28 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 7 8840U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1076
42.97124600638978%
Multi-Core
7454
85.05248744865358%
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
