Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 2766 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 145 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 26% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2697 v3 - 157 vs 125 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1076
39.9702823179792%
Multi-Core
7454
45.94711212476114%
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 14 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
