Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 5028 days newer than Xeon E5540.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 70% better in Rust than Xeon E5540 - 257 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5540 - 32 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5540
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5540
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Single-Core
371
13.58974358974359%
Multi-Core
1553
9.019106800627213%
Intel Xeon E5540 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Nehalem-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
