Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4677 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 50% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5645 - 132 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 32 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
359
13.150183150183151%
Multi-Core
1681
9.76247168825135%
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
