Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4685 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 80 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 24% better in God of War than Xeon E5645 - 201 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
359
11.561996779388084%
Multi-Core
1681
7.699354188613566%
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
