Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Xeon W-11955M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 889 days newer than Xeon W-11955M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-11955M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Diablo IV than Xeon W-11955M - 362 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-11955M - 32 vs 16 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-11955M
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2021
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-11955M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1499 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
