Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon W-2195 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1962 days newer than Xeon W-2195.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2195
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 140 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield V than Xeon W-2195 - 298 vs 236 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2195 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-2195
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-2195 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 18 | Cores | 24 |
36 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
