Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 5036 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon W3520 - 348 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Single-Core
413
13.301127214170695%
Multi-Core
1395
6.389410525351533%
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
