Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 5397 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 292% better in Diablo IV than Xeon W3520 - 353 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 32 vs 8 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3520
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Single-Core
413
13.675496688741722%
Multi-Core
1395
7.635467980295567%
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
