Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4511 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon W3670 - 338 vs 297 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3670 - 32 vs 12 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon W3670
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
