Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 4312 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 90% better in War Thunder than Xeon W3680 - 256 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 24 vs 12 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
555
21.85899960614415%
Multi-Core
2540
18.286537077033838%
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
