Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 5046 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 45% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon W3680 - 133 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-14900HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
555
19.80728051391863%
Multi-Core
2540
15.379026398643738%
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
