Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon w5-3425 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 42 days older than Xeon w5-3425.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 49% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Xeon w5-3425 - 203 vs 136 FPS
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon w5-3425
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon w5-3425
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Single-Core
1813
66.41025641025641%
Multi-Core
12195
70.82292816075265%
Intel Xeon w5-3425 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 24 |
| 24 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
