Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon w5-3425 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 327 days newer than Xeon w5-3425.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 10% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon w5-3425 - 335 vs 305 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w5-3425 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Single-Core
1813
61.541072640868975%
Multi-Core
12195
76.87700939292694%
Intel Xeon w5-3425 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |