Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon w7-3465X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 34 days older than Xeon w7-3465X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-3465X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 56 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 45% better in Diablo IV than Xeon w7-3465X - 362 vs 249 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w7-3465X doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon w7-3465X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon w7-3465X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 24 |
56 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 150 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
