Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon w9-3475X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 34 days older than Xeon w9-3475X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w9-3475X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 72 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon w9-3475X - 196 vs 192 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w9-3475X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon w9-3475X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon w9-3475X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
36 | Cores | 24 |
72 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 150 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
