Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 5046 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 51% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon X5650 - 136 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
449
15.241004752206381%
Multi-Core
2222
14.0074386938158%
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
