Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon X5670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4677 days newer than Xeon X5670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon X5670 - 241 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5670 - 32 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5670
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5670
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
482
17.655677655677657%
Multi-Core
2257
13.107613682559963%
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
