Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon X5677 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 4403 days newer than Xeon X5677.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5677
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 130 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 44% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon X5677 - 131 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5677 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5677 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5677
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5677
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
509
18.907875185735513%
Multi-Core
2015
12.420637366701596%
Intel Xeon X5677 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
