Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 5076 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 26% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon X5680 - 196 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5680 - 32 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5680
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Single-Core
530
17.549668874172188%
Multi-Core
2448
13.399014778325121%
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
