Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 2077 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 34% cheaper than Radeon R9 290X - $138.29 vs $210.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon R9 290X - $3.64 vs $3.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 65 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 42% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 54 vs 38 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
38
70.37037037037037%
Value, $/FPS
$3.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311751 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.89/FPS
93.573264781491%
Price, $
$210
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311752 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
32.375%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
23.545454545454543%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2013 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $549 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |