Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms the cheaper Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon RX 5700 XT is 2098 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Up to 51% cheaper than Radeon RX 5700 XT - $116.51 vs $239.99
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT - 55 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Performs up to 135% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R7 250 - 80 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 13% better value when playing Elden Ring than Radeon R7 250 - $3.0 vs $3.43 per FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 8 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
34
42.5%
Value, $/FPS
$3.43/FPS
87.46355685131195%
Price, $
$116.51
100%
Buy for $116.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310097 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
48%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310097 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
12.14109926168991%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
9.711286089238845%
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1605 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1905 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |