Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Radeon RX Vega 56 is 617 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Performs up to 45% better in Starfield than GeForce GTX 1650 - 29 vs 20 FPS
- Up to 20% better value when playing Starfield than GeForce GTX 1650 - $6.21 vs $7.75 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 14% cheaper than Radeon RX Vega 56 - $154.99 vs $179.99
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - 75 vs 210 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
FPS
29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
86%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241363 minutes ago
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241362 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
94.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
329.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
28%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Aug 14th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Vega | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$399 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
2x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
HBM2 | Type | GDDR5 |
2048-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
409.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1156 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1471 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |