Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6800 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6800 is 491 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 95% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6800 - $99.99 vs $1891.29
- Up to 86% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Radeon Pro W6800 - $3.12 vs $22.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6800 - 30 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Performs up to 166% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Arc A310 - 85 vs 32 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 32 vs 4 GB
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
32
37.64705882352941%
Value, $/FPS
$3.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311551 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
FPS
85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$22.25/FPS
14.02247191011236%
Price, $
$1891.29
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,891.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311551 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
12.572968118545127%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
10.057471264367816%
Desktop • Jun 8th, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
222.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6800 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 8th, 2021 |
Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $2249 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 32 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2075 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2320 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |