Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6800 XT outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 6800 XT is 714 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 78% cheaper than Radeon RX 6800 XT - $99.99 vs $449.4
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield V than Radeon RX 6800 XT - $0.96 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT - 30 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Performs up to 126% better in Battlefield V than Arc A310 - 235 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 16 vs 4 GB
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
104
44.25531914893617%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310279 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
50.26178010471204%
Price, $
$449.4
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $449.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310280 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
9.722222222222223%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
8.641975308641975%
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
648 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
Alchemist | Generation | Navi II |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1825 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |