Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6400 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 6400 is 266 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 33% cheaper than Radeon RX 6400 - $99.99 vs $149.99
- Up to 28% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon RX 6400 - $1.69 vs $2.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6400 - 30 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Arc A310 - 64 vs 59 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
59
92.1875%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310333 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.34/FPS
72.22222222222221%
Price, $
$149.99
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310333 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
37.70028275212064%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
50.269299820466784%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Alchemist | Generation | Navi II |
Not Available | MSRP | $159 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1923 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2321 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |