Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A380 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A380 is 1148 days newer than the more expensive GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1650 - 55 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $99.99 vs $154.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1650 - $1.82 vs $3.04 per FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 6 vs 4 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309971 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
51
92.72727272727272%
Value, $/FPS
$3.04/FPS
59.86842105263158%
Price, $
$154.99
64%
Buy for $154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309971 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
81.21951219512195%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
71.0670731707317%
Intel Arc A380 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jun 14th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$149 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
96-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
186 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |