Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 266 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon Pro W6400 - 89 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - $239.99 vs $243.49
- Up to 27% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon Pro W6400 - $2.7 vs $3.69 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 50 vs 225 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$239.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315073 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
66
74.15730337078652%
Value, $/FPS
$3.69/FPS
73.17073170731709%
Price, $
$243.49
98%
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315073 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
27.749255952380953%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
20.814732142857142%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$289 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |