Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1062 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 50 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 62% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Radeon Pro W6400 - 63 vs 39 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - $145.42 vs $243.49
- Up to 63% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Radeon Pro W6400 - $2.31 vs $6.24 per FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 6 vs 4 GB
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241535 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $145.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241535 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
65%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |