Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper Radeon RX 6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon RX 6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A750 is 266 days newer than the cheaper Radeon RX 6400.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 35% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon RX 6400 - 89 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon RX 6400 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Up to 38% cheaper than Arc A750 - $149.99 vs $239.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Arc A750 - $1.84 vs $2.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 53 vs 225 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.19/FPS
84.01826484018265%
Price, $
$239.99
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315093 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
66
74.15730337078652%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
27.63020833333333%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
20.721726190476193%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Alchemist | Generation | Navi II |
$289 | MSRP | $159 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1923 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2321 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |