Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 64 is 2856 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 88% cheaper than Radeon RX Vega 64 - $35.99 vs $299.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Radeon RX Vega 64 - $2.57 vs $9.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 31 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Performs up to 129% better in Immortals of Aveum than GeForce 210 - 32 vs 14 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0 GB
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
FPS
14
43.75%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$35.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $35.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309977 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
FPS
32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.37/FPS
27.427961579509073%
Price, $
$299.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
2.102284212654134%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
1.0510358767054067%
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | vs | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Vega |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | HBM2 |
64-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1247 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1546 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |