Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 4482 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 85% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - $35.99 vs $243.49
- Up to 76% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Radeon Pro W6400 - $2.57 vs $10.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 31 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 64% better in Immortals of Aveum than GeForce 210 - 23 vs 14 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0 GB
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
FPS
14
60.86956521739131%
Value, $/FPS
$2.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$35.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $35.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309975 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
23
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.59/FPS
24.268177525967893%
Price, $
$243.49
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $243.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309974 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
2.7885775573133125%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
3.7176050044682754%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 210 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
520 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |