Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3444 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 57% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $59.96 vs $138.29
- Up to 53% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - $0.72 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 8% better in Dirt 5 than GeForce GT 220 - 90 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
FPS
83
92.22222222222223%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312724 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
46.75324675324675%
Price, $
$138.29
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $138.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
23.166023166023166%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
34.74903474903475%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |