Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce GT 220 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 5100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce GT 220 is 2488 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 5100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 68% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 5100 - $59.96 vs $188.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon Pro WX 5100 - $59.96 vs $188.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 - 58 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
FPS
1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$59.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312865 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
FPS
1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$188.99/FPS
31.726546378115245%
Price, $
$188.99
31%
Buy for $188.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312865 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
13.81294964028777%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
11.842105263157896%
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
34.75 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
121.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 18th, 2016 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 160 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 713 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1086 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |