Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 56 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 56 is 2757 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 67% cheaper than Radeon RX Vega 56 - $59.96 vs $179.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Radeon RX Vega 56 - $0.72 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - 58 vs 210 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Performs up to 53% better in Dirt 5 than GeForce GT 220 - 127 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
FPS
83
65.35433070866141%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312753 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
50.70422535211267%
Price, $
$179.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312753 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
5.098789037603569%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
4.3702579666160855%
Desktop • Aug 14th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
94.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
329.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 14th, 2017 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Vega |
Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | HBM2 |
128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1156 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1471 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 800 MHz |