Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GT 220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A750 is 4642 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Up to 75% cheaper than Arc A750 - $59.96 vs $239.99
- Up to 50% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Arc A750 - $1.36 vs $2.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 58 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 102% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than GeForce GT 220 - 89 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
FPS
44
49.43820224719101%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312985 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.7/FPS
50.37037037037037%
Price, $
$239.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 312983 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
1.7857142857142856%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
2.6785714285714284%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |