Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce MX350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2139 days older than GeForce MX350.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 2 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 108% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce MX350 - 81 vs 39 FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce MX350 - 19 vs 20 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
GeForce MX | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
747 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
937 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |