Key Differences
In short — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper ACER Nitro 5 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ACER Nitro 5 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 17% better in Counter-Strike 2 than ACER Nitro 5 - 244 vs 209 FPS
Advantages of ACER Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 43% cheaper than Asus TUF A16 - $839.0 vs $1479.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Asus TUF A16 - $4.01 vs $6.06 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
FPS
244
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.06/FPS
66.17161716171617%
Price, $
$1479
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,479 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 444349 minutes ago
12th Variation
FPS
209
85.65573770491804%
Value, $/FPS
$4.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$839
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 444347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
2nd Variation
12th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
Radeon RX 7600S
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
140.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
246.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
30.028409090909093%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27.455357142857146%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
100%
Multi-Core
7887
100%
12th Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
100%
Multi-Core
7887
100%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | ACER Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| Radeon RX 7600S | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
