Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing acer Nitro 50 N50 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 82% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $989.0 vs $5499.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $4.16 vs $9.37 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 147% better in Counter-Strike 2 than acer Nitro 50 N50 - 587 vs 238 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
13th Variation
FPS
238
40.54514480408859%
Value, $/FPS
$4.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$989
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 435128 minutes ago
FPS
587
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.37/FPS
44.397011739594454%
Price, $
$5499.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 435127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
13th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12.013528748590756%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
7.227906976744186%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
73.67182246133154%
Multi-Core
8910
44.22275163787969%
acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |