Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2194 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 5% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-3240 - 250 vs 238 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 72% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $41.0 vs $149.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Ready or Not than Athlon 200GE - $0.17 vs $0.6 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
250
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
28.33333333333334%
Price, $
$149
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361154 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
238
95.19999999999999%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
62.31721034870641%
Multi-Core
1137
61.22778675282714%
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |