Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2144 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 57% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-8300 - 36 vs 23 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 68% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $47.98 vs $149.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Athlon 200GE - $2.09 vs $4.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.14/FPS
50.48309178743962%
Price, $
$149
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361064 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
23
63.888888888888886%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361064 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |