Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 922 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $149.0 vs $150.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 200GE - 120 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 200GE - $1.25 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
98
81.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
82.23684210526315%
Price, $
$149
100%
Buy for $149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354264 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
41.89443920829406%
Multi-Core
1857
22.679531021006348%
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |