Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 2200G - 216 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $130.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-11600 - $0.66 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
95.6521739130435%
Price, $
$150
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353942 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
198
91.66666666666666%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353943 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
46.98397737983035%
Multi-Core
2858
34.904738641914996%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |