Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2353 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 46% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-9590 - 38 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than FX-9590 - $63.83 vs $298.02
- Up to 85% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-9590 - $1.68 vs $11.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
38
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348909 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
26
68.42105263157895%
Value, $/FPS
$11.46/FPS
14.659685863874344%
Price, $
$298.02
21%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |