Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - $128.04 vs $285.0
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 335% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-6300 - 100 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 49% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-6300 - $2.85 vs $5.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348428 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$285
44%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |